David Sacks has just been appointed Trump’s AI & Crypto Czar—but what does that actually mean for startups?
If you’re a founder building in Web3, AI, or defense tech, this appointment might be the most important signal of the next four years.
In this article, I’ll break down what this move means, why it matters, and how it could reshape the venture funding landscape, regulatory policy, and capital access for high-growth founders like you.
David Sacks—former PayPal COO, Yammer founder, and Craft Ventures GP—has been tapped as Trump’s “AI & Crypto Policy Advisor” ahead of the 2026 election cycle.
This isn’t symbolic.
It’s strategic.
Sacks is now the unofficial policy architect for how a second Trump administration could approach:
Expect him to have real influence.
Because he’s fluent in tech, markets, media, and power.
Here’s what makes Sacks the perfect pick:
In short: he’s a tech bro with policy chops.
Sacks’ appointment signals a pro-founder, pro-innovation shift—especially if Trump wins again.
While the current administration leans cautious on AI and crypto, Sacks represents:
Founders building in sensitive or emerging tech now have a potential champion inside the White House.
If you're in AI, here’s what could change:
This is pro-accelerationism with a pragmatic edge.
Under Sacks' influence, expect a U-turn in regulatory posture toward crypto.
That could mean:
Founders in Web3 infra, wallets, stablecoins, or tokenized assets will likely see a regulatory tailwind.
Here’s the real alpha: Sacks understands that AI and crypto aren’t separate lanes.
They’re converging.
Expect a push for:
If you’re building in this overlap, this is your greenlight.
With Sacks advising Trump, defense tech might become the new climate tech—heavily funded, politically supported.
Startups in:
…should prepare for DoD-backed venture booms.
Possibly.
Sacks has already pulled Elon, Thiel, Balaji, and Chamath into his orbit.
This could normalize:
2026 might be the year founders stop pretending to be apolitical.
Sacks, Chamath, Friedberg, and Jason have made All-In a soft power machine.
Now, with Sacks in Trump’s circle, those Thursday night takes could become next week’s policy draft.
Founders, pay attention.
Here’s your cheat sheet:
✅ AI acceleration policy
✅ Crypto-friendly infrastructure
✅ China hawkishness in tech
✅ Lower capital gains on startup equity
✅ Increased defense R&D spend
❌ Less support for ESG/climate tech
Maybe not literally.
But referencing Craft, or aligning your thesis with:
…is smart signaling if you’re fundraising from LPs aligned with that worldview.
And if you’re launching a company this year, now’s the time to go bold.
That depends on where you stand.
But from a pure founder lens, this is the most:
posture we’ve seen from any potential administration in years.
Yes.
Expect:
Your sector will matter more than ever.
Let’s be real—Sacks already has outsized influence in:
Now? Add regulatory gatekeeper to the list.
We advise founders to:
✅ Use pro-innovation framing
✅ Lean into strategic resilience (supply chains, compute, infra)
✅ Highlight security, autonomy, or privacy benefits
✅ Avoid ESG jargon and show ROI
VCs will have to pick lanes:
Look for new “Craft-aligned” syndicates to pop up.
Sacks has long railed against:
Expect him to help founders bypass the red tape—legally.
Whether or not you like Trump, David Sacks becoming AI & Crypto Czar is a game-changing moment.
It reshapes how AI, crypto, and defense founders will raise, operate, and exit in the next 5 years.
Don’t ignore the power dynamics.
Subscribe to Capitaly.vc Substack (https://capitaly.substack.com/) to raise capital at the speed of AI.
1. Is David Sacks officially part of Trump’s 2026 campaign?
Not officially, but he’s a key advisor and policy architect.
2. What sectors benefit most from his role?
AI infrastructure, defense tech, crypto/Web3, decentralized platforms.
3. Is this pro-crypto or just anti-SEC?
Both. Sacks wants regulatory clarity and innovation freedom.
4. Does this mean VCs will become more political?
Yes. Power and capital are aligning like never before.
5. Will this affect how founders pitch?
Absolutely. Messaging around sovereignty, decentralization, and acceleration will resonate more.
6. What’s the risk if Trump loses?
Biden-era regulatory caution could continue, especially around crypto.
7. Is Sacks trying to replace Peter Thiel’s political role?
No, but he’s taking a similar path—just with more startup operator cred.
8. Will AI companies need political lobbying now?
Not directly, but alignment with policy priorities will matter.
9. What should international founders know?
U.S.-aligned startups may get preferential funding, access, and policy tailwinds.
10. Should I care if I’m building consumer SaaS?
Less directly, but downstream effects on infra, capital markets, and media will still touch you.