David Sacks Playbook for SaaS Founders: Burn Multiple, Rule of 40, and NDR Explained [2025]

‍

The David Sacks playbook is the clearest way I know to master SaaS metrics and build a durable, fundable company in 2025.

Founders ask the same question every week: What should I measure right now so I don’t run out of cash or goodwill with investors.

In this guide, I break down Burn Multiple, Rule of 40, and Net Dollar Retention the way I use them in the field, not just in a boardroom slide.

You’ll get plain-English formulas, stage-based targets, and battle-tested moves to fix weak numbers fast.

I’ll also share AI-era updates that most articles still miss, like how inference costs distort gross margin and why cohort math matters more than ever.

‍

1) What is the David Sacks playbook for SaaS metrics

When people say “David Sacks playbook,” they mean a no-nonsense system to measure growth quality, capital efficiency, and customer love.

It focuses on a few metrics that matter and ignores vanity stats.

Here’s the essence I use with teams:

• Burn Multiple: How much net burn do you spend for each dollar of net new ARR.
• Rule of 40: Growth rate plus profitability equals 40% or more, adjusted for stage and cycle.
• Net Dollar Retention (NDR): The scoreboard for whether customers buy more or leave you.
• CAC Payback and Sales Efficiency: How fast your sales engine returns cash.
• Gross Margin: The truth about your unit economics, now reshaped by AI costs.

The David Sacks playbook cuts through noise so you can be default investable even in tough markets.

It’s also the fastest way to earn trust on a partner meeting slide.

2) The Burn Multiple: the simple efficiency metric investors grade first

I call Burn Multiple the lie detector test for SaaS growth.

It tells you how much you burn to buy one dollar of net new ARR.

Formula:

• Burn Multiple = Net Burn in period ÷ Net New ARR in period

Examples:

• If you burned $2M and added $1M ARR, Burn Multiple = 2.0.
• If you burned $1M and added $2M ARR, Burn Multiple = 0.5.

Targets I use in 2025:

• Pre-Seed/Seed: 1.5–2.5 while finding repeatability.
• Series A: 1.0–1.5 as you scale a proven motion.
• Series B–C: 0.5–1.0 for elite companies.
• Late-stage: 0–0.5, with many quarters in cash-flow breakeven.

Three ways to improve it quickly:

• Zero-based budgeting: Rebuild spend from first principles instead of trimming 10% off last quarter.
• Concentrate focus: One ICP, one motion, one hero product until net new ARR compounds.
• Fix gross margin leaks: Move AI inference from premium GPU to CPU where possible, bake caching and batching in, and renegotiate LLM rates.

For more on budgeting mechanics, see our blog post: Zero-Based Budgeting for Startups.

3) Why Burn Multiple beats vanity growth every time

I once worked with a company growing 120% YoY on the surface, but their Burn Multiple hovered at 3.0.

They were buying growth with inefficient sales and undisciplined experiments.

When we cut distracted side projects, tightened ICP, and staffed RevOps early, the Burn Multiple dropped to 1.2 within two quarters.

Investors changed from skeptical to excited, even though reported growth slowed to 80%.

Lesson:

• Quality of growth beats raw growth.
• Burn Multiple captures the quality.
• Great companies show improving efficiency while still growing.

4) The Rule of 40: the 2025 version that actually matters

The classic Rule of 40 is simple: Growth % + Profitability % ≥ 40%.

In practice, you need rules-of-thumb by stage and a clear definition of “profitability.”

My 2025 approach:

• Use ARR growth % YoY for earlier stage, and revenue growth % for later stage.
• Use Operating Margin (GAAP or adjusted consistently) instead of EBITDA margin if you’re still investing heavily.
• Weight growth more pre-scale: At Seed–A, a Rule of 30 with strong NDR is fine.

Targets by stage:

• Seed–A: Rule of 30–40 if NDR ≥ 110% and CAC payback ≤ 18 months.
• B: Rule of 40–50 with improving margins.
• C+: Rule of 50–60 for the best, or consistent 40+ with cash generation.

Two crucial updates for 2025:

• AI gross margin discount: If your gross margin is 55–65% due to inference, investors will judge your Rule of 40 in that context but still expect a path to 70%+.
• Cohort-led view: Demonstrate that mature cohorts are profitable even if blended margins lag.

For a deeper dive on growth quality, see our blog post: SaaS Metrics That Actually Predict Fundraising Success.

5) Net Dollar Retention (NDR): definition, measurement, and how to fix it

NDR shows how your existing customers expand or shrink over time.

It’s the heartbeat of durable SaaS.

Formula:

• NDR = (Starting ARR from a cohort + Expansion – Contraction – Churn) ÷ Starting ARR

Benchmarks I push for:

• Good: 110–120%.
• Great: 120–130%.
• Elite: 130%+ for developer, data, and infrastructure products.

Three plays that materially raise NDR:

• Value-based packaging: Align price with a clear value metric like seats, tracked entities, or processed volume.
• Success-led onboarding: Month 1 outcomes drive month 13 renewals.
• Revenue operations: Owns expansion motions, health scoring, and renewal discipline.

A quick story:

A product analytics startup hovered at 98% NDR.

We moved from unlimited usage to bands with automatic overage, added one new premium capability per quarter, and tied CSM goals to expansion.

Within two renewals, NDR rose to 121% and CAC payback fell under 12 months.

For tactical retention levers, see our blog post: How to Build a High-NDR Expansion Motion.

6) Gross margin in the AI era: what changes and what doesn’t

Gross margin is your moat against volatility.

AI products complicate COGS with inference, training, vector storage, and observability spend.

My rule in 2025:

• Classify all model calls and GPU/TPU spend as COGS, not R&D, if they scale with usage.
• Target 70%+ gross margin by Series B, even for AI-heavy products.
• Engineer for margin: Caching, prompt compression, batch inference, and hybrid model routing.

Two investor-proof tips:

• Report gross margin for AI features separately to show improvement path.
• Renegotiate model rates quarterly and test open-source models for predictable workloads.

For finance stack setup, see our blog post: Startup Finance Stack: From Day One to IPO.

7) CAC Payback and Sales Efficiency: the speed of money returning

CAC Payback tells you how many months of gross profit it takes to recover your customer acquisition cost.

Formula:

• CAC Payback (months) = CAC ÷ Gross Profit per month from new customers

Targets I like:

• PLG or bottom-up: 6–12 months is strong.
• Sales-led mid-market: 12–18 months.
• Enterprise: 18–24 months if retention is elite.

Complementary metrics:

• Magic Number: (Current quarter ARR delta × 4) ÷ last quarter’s S&M spend. Above 0.75 is decent. Above 1.0 is strong.
• Quick Ratio: New + expansion ÷ churn + contraction. Aim for 4+ while scaling.

Fixes that work:

• Shorten time-to-value with guided onboarding.
• Price for annual prepay to improve cash cycle.
• Standardize discovery so AEs qualify out faster.

For a practical calculator, see our blog post: CAC Payback Model for SaaS Founders.

8) Pipeline coverage and forecast hygiene: stop sandbagging and guessing

Healthy pipeline coverage is 3–4x for the next quarter’s target.

But coverage without hygiene is a mirage.

Here’s my simple checklist:

• Stage definitions tied to customer actions, not rep feelings.
• Exit criteria for each stage, rigorously enforced by sales leadership.
• Win-loss interviews every month to calibrate messaging and ICP.

Forecast rhythm I use:

• Monday pipeline review with commits, best case, and upside.
• Wednesday deal strategy on 10–20 must-win opportunities.
• Friday next-step audit to remove stale deals.

For sales forecasting templates, see our blog post: Building a No-Drama Revenue Forecast.

9) Default Alive vs Default Investable in 2025

“Default alive” means you hit profitability before cash runs out.

In 2025, that’s not always optimal if your NDR and CAC payback are excellent.

I coach teams toward “default investable” instead:

• Clear 18–24 month runway with improving Burn Multiple.
• Rule of 40 trending up across two quarters.
• NDR ≥ 115% with multi-year renewal discipline.

If you can show those, you’re investable even before profitability.

For fundraising timing, see our blog post: When to Raise Your Next Round.

10) Cohorts: the only way to trust your metrics

Every metric can be gamed unless you cohort it.

I ask for three cohort views at a minimum:

• ARR by signup quarter to show retention and expansion curves.
• Gross margin by cohort to separate legacy pricing and AI-heavy workloads.
• Payback by channel for paid search, outbound, and partner motions.

Pro tip:

Show a cohort that is already profitable on a unit basis.

That tells the story better than any blended average.

11) Pricing strategy: seat, usage, or value metric

Pricing is the lever most founders underuse.

I recommend a hybrid approach:

• Seat-based for collaboration, compliance, and security products.
• Usage-based for data, AI, and infra services where value scales with volume.
• Value metric add-ons for premium capabilities like SSO, audit trails, or advanced analytics.

Guardrails I follow:

• Three good-better-best tiers, with clear fences.
• Annual prepay discount only if it improves NDR and cash.
• In-product paywalls so expansion feels natural, not sales-driven.

For a step-by-step method, see our blog post: How to Pick Your SaaS Value Metric.

12) Expansion revenue playbook for higher NDR

Expansion is a system, not luck.

Here’s my blueprint:

• CSM plays tied to milestones like first dashboard created, first integration added, and first executive login.
• Quarterly value reviews that quantify outcomes, not usage vanity.
• Champions program with training, community, and early access.

Offer bundles that unlock new jobs-to-be-done:

• Compliance pack for enterprise upgrades.
• Automation pack for efficiency buyers.
• AI pack for strategic teams willing to pay for speed.

For playbooks and talk tracks, see our blog post: Designing Expansion Motions that Compound.

13) Churn surgery: diagnose before you prescribe

Churn is a symptom, not a diagnosis.

I separate it into five buckets:

• Onboarding failure: Customers never reached time-to-value.
• Product gap: Missing must-have feature for core use case.
• Bad ICP: Signed the wrong customer to hit a quarterly number.
• Macro or budget: CFO cuts tools with weak ROI proof.
• Champion churn: Buyer leaves and renewal falls apart.

Fixes that move numbers:

• Activation SLA for onboarding within 14 days.
• Critical feature sprints to close one gap per quarter.
• Qualification guardrails to say “no” faster.
• Customer proof packs with hard ROI math.

For retention metrics and templates, see our blog post: Reducing Churn with a 90-Day Playbook.

14) Zero-based budgeting to improve Burn Multiple fast

Zero-based budgeting sounds painful.

It’s actually liberating.

I rebuild the plan from the outcomes we want, not last quarter’s spend.

Steps I run with founders:

• Set ARR targets by ICP and motion.
• Back into headcount using observed productivity, not wishful thinking.
• Fund 3 bets that can change the curve, and cut the rest.

This discipline improves Burn Multiple within one quarter because every dollar has a job.

For a worksheet, see our blog post: Zero-Based Budgeting for SaaS.

15) PLG vs sales-led: manage a blended model without chaos

Most winning companies in 2025 are hybrid.

They land with PLG and expand with sales.

The trick is clean segmentation:

• Self-serve under a usage or seat threshold.
• Assisted for mid-market with guided onboarding.
• Sales-led for enterprise with security and compliance needs.

Key metric alignment:

• One funnel, multiple lanes with clear handoffs between growth and sales.
• Attribution rules that reflect team effort, not politics.
• Pricing fences so PLG upgrades flow into sales naturally.

For more on PLG metrics, see our blog post: PLG Metrics That Matter.

16) Board reporting cadence and KPI guardrails

A clean board pack builds credibility.

My must-have sections:

• Highlights and lowlights in one page.
• ARR bridge showing new, expansion, contraction, churn.
• Efficiency with Burn Multiple, CAC payback, and Magic Number.
• Pipeline and forecast with coverage and conversion by stage.
• Product and roadmap tied to one metric each.

Rules that prevent surprises:

• Same definitions every quarter to avoid number drift.
• Close book by day 10 and share draft by day 12.
• Quarterly metric deep-dive on a rotating theme like NDR or gross margin.

For a board deck template, see our blog post: The No-Spin Board Deck.

17) When to raise: runway, signal, and narrative

Fundraising is about pattern-matching and proof.

I advise raising when you can show:

• 12–18 months runway post-round with a clear path to 24.
• Two improving efficiency metrics over two consecutive quarters.
• A repeatable motion with cohort proof.

Signals that resonate:

• NDR ≥ 120% and multi-year prepay growth.
• Burn Multiple trending toward 1.0 or better.
• Enterprise wins with security and compliance approvals.

For narrative structure, see our blog post: Crafting a Fundraising Story That Converts.

18) Craft Ventures benchmarks: where you should land by stage

Every investor set has its own bar.

Craft Ventures and the David Sacks playbook emphasize efficiency married to growth.

Here is a simplified benchmark set I use as a working guide:

• Seed: $1–2M ARR, NDR 100–110%, CAC payback ≤ 18 months, Burn Multiple ≤ 2.5.
• Series A: $2–5M ARR, 2–3x YoY, NDR 110–120%, CAC payback ≤ 15 months, Burn Multiple 1.0–1.5.
• Series B: $5–15M ARR, 80–120% YoY, NDR 120%+, CAC payback ≤ 12 months, Burn Multiple 0.7–1.2.
• Series C+: $15M+ ARR, 40–80% YoY, NDR 120–130%+, CAC payback ≤ 12 months, Burn Multiple 0.3–0.8, Rule of 40 consistently.

Treat these as directional, not dogma.

Your product, margin profile, and market velocity will shape the bar.

19) Common mistakes founders make with these metrics

I see the same avoidable errors over and over.

Here’s my top ten list:

• Counting bookings as ARR without normalizing for start dates or ramps.
• Hiding AI inference in R&D instead of COGS.
• No cohort views, only blended averages.
• Payback calc on revenue, not gross profit.
• Underscoped RevOps that keeps sales blind.
• Vanity pilots with no path to production.
• Too many ICPs before crossing $10M ARR.
• Annual plans without prepay, which starve cash.
• Discounting as a habit instead of value selling.
• Changing metric definitions each quarter to look better.

Avoid these and your numbers will start to tell a credible story fast.

20) A simple weekly metrics dashboard I use

If you only track a handful of numbers weekly, make them these:

• ARR and net new ARR this week and month-to-date.
• Burn Multiple on a trailing 13-week basis.
• NDR for the last complete quarter and rolling three-month view.
• CAC Payback by primary channel.
• Gross Margin split by AI vs non-AI workloads.
• Pipeline Coverage for the next two quarters.

That dashboard fits on one page and exposes truth without debate.

Worked example: turning the playbook into action in 90 days

Let me show you how this comes together.

A B2B AI compliance startup hit $4M ARR with 65% gross margin, 109% NDR, and 2.2 Burn Multiple.

They had nine ideal customer profiles and four competing motions.

We cut to one ICP, rebuilt pricing around records monitored, and moved GPU-heavy inference to a hybrid model.

In 90 days:

• NDR rose to 118% from expansion on compliance packs.
• Gross margin improved to 71% via routing and caching.
• Burn Multiple dropped to 1.3 with zero-based budgeting.
• CAC payback fell from 16 to 12 months after tightening qualification.

They closed a strong Series A because the quality of growth became obvious.

How to talk about these metrics in a pitch

Founders often bury the lede.

Here’s the order I use in a partner meeting:

• What we do and for whom in one sentence.
• ARR and growth rate with cohort proof.
• NDR and why expansion is working.
• Burn Multiple trend with levers you control.
• Gross margin, AI vs non-AI split, and path to improvement.
• CAC payback and pipeline coverage for next two quarters.
• Why now, with category momentum and customer proof.

Keep it simple and make the math undeniable.

AI-era nuances most articles still miss

AI changes the unit-economics game.

Here are five nuances I rarely see in top-ranking posts:

• Inference spikiness demands dynamic routing across models to maintain margin.
• Token-aware UX can cut costs 20–40% without hurting outcomes.
• On-prem or VPC deployments can lift enterprise ACV and NDR, offsetting lower raw gross margin.
• Model obsolescence means your COGS curve improves as models get cheaper and better, if you design for swapability.
• FinOps for AI belongs in RevOps’ toolkit, not only in engineering.

These details win diligence calls because they show you understand the new cost stack.

Operational checklist for the next 30 days

If you want momentum now, run this checklist:

• Week 1: Freeze metric definitions, set up cohort views, and publish a simple weekly dashboard.
• Week 2: Map COGS for AI features, launch model routing, and pilot a token-aware UX.
• Week 3: Tighten ICP, fix stage exit criteria, and clean the pipeline.
• Week 4: Repackage pricing with clear value metrics and add one expansion bundle.

You’ll see NDR, gross margin, and Burn Multiple move within one quarter.

FAQs: quick answers founders ask me every week

What is a good Burn Multiple for a SaaS startup in 2025

Seed to A should aim for 1.0–1.5 as repeatability appears.

Below 1.0 at B+ is elite.

How do I calculate NDR correctly

Use same-customer cohorts, ARR basis, and include expansion, contraction, and churn.

Exclude new logos.

Does Rule of 40 still matter if I’m early

Yes, but weight growth more.

A Rule of 30 with strong NDR and improving efficiency is fine at Seed–A.

What’s the fastest way to improve CAC payback

Shorten time-to-value, qualify out faster, and push annual prepay.

Those three moves lower payback within a quarter.

How should AI inference be treated in my P&L

Put usage-linked model costs in COGS.

Report AI and non-AI gross margin separately with a path to 70%+.

What NDR target should I set for mid-market vs enterprise

Mid-market 110–120% is solid.

Enterprise 120–130%+ is achievable with strong expansion plays.

How many pricing tiers should I have

Three tiers with clear fences plus add-ons is the sweet spot.

Too many tiers confuse buyers and sales.

Should I mix PLG and sales-led

Yes, but segment clearly and design clean handoffs.

Track payback by lane to avoid channel conflict.

How much pipeline coverage is enough

Three to four times next quarter’s target with strict stage exit criteria.

Coverage without hygiene is noise.

When should I raise my next round

When you can show two quarters of improving efficiency, NDR above 115%, and a clear runway story.

How do I explain a weak gross margin if I’m AI-heavy

Split AI and non-AI margins, show routing and caching initiatives, and prove a path to 70%+.

What’s one slide most founders forget in board decks

An ARR bridge that cleanly reconciles new, expansion, contraction, and churn.

It prevents confusion and builds trust.

Conclusion

The David Sacks playbook works because it forces focus on what compounding companies do best.

Run your business on Burn Multiple, Rule of 40, and NDR, and you’ll see the signal through the noise.

Use cohort math, fix gross margin with AI-aware engineering, and price on value so expansion does the heavy lifting.

Do that and your metrics will not just look good.

They will tell a story investors want to fund.

If you want the short version, here it is.

Default investable companies in 2025 show improving Burn Multiple, credible Rule of 40, and rising Net Dollar Retention.

That is the heart of the David Sacks playbook.

Subscribe to Capitaly.vc Substack (https://capitaly.substack.com/) to raise capital at the speed of AI.