David Sacks remote work is the question I hear most from founders who are trying to decide how to run their teams without slowing growth.
I’ve run hybrid and remote teams through different market cycles, and I’ve learned that the issue isn’t office vs remote.
The real issue is how you design the operating system of your company so that culture, meetings, and async execution actually scale.
In this article, I’ll share a no-nonsense playbook inspired by operators like David Sacks and pressure-tested in startups where speed, clarity, and accountability matter.
You’ll see how to set anchor days, make async work actually work, tune your meeting cadence, and build a written culture that holds everyone to a standard.
Along the way, I’ll include templates, tools, and tactics you can copy today.
.png)
I stopped arguing about remote vs office the day I realized most companies were debating identity, not outcomes.
My lens now is simple: what structure creates the fastest, cleanest path from decision to customer impact.
When I coach founders, I propose a hybrid model with explicit purpose: in-office for creation and integration, remote for heads-down throughput.
That’s the pattern I’ve seen echoed by pragmatic operators, including David Sacks.
Hybrid works when everyone knows when to converge and when to focus.
I like anchor days Tuesday–Thursday in-office for cross-functional collaboration, with Monday and Friday remote for deep work.
Set this once, publish the rhythm, and hold to it.
Chaos comes from exceptions, not from rules.
For more on operating rhythm and capital efficiency, see our blog post: Operating Rhythm for Startups.
If the work can be written, it should be written before people meet.
Async is not about fewer meetings.
It’s about better decisions with fewer people.
At my last company, switching to memo-first cut standing meetings by 40% and raised the quality of product tradeoffs.
We didn’t guess.
We wrote, debated asynchronously, then decided fast.
Not all meetings are bad.
Bad meetings are bad.
A scaling cadence looks like this:
Put each meeting on one page with purpose, inputs, outputs, and owners.
Then defend the calendar like it’s uptime.
For more on metrics-driven management, see our blog post: Building Your Metrics Stack.
The WOR is your heartbeat.
It’s how you keep promises to customers and to yourselves.
When we tightened our WOR, our cycle time improved without heroic sprints.
It wasn’t magic.
It was the discipline of one operating meeting that actually operated.
Great hybrid teams ship because they write clear specs and review real demos.
I like a six-week cycle: weeks 1–2 spec, weeks 3–5 build, week 6 stabilize and ship.
It makes the work legible across time zones and keeps surprises out of late-stage QA.
OKRs can align a hybrid team or waste a quarter.
The difference is simplicity.
Your OKR doc should be a living scoreboard, not a quarterly novel.
For more on goal setting and operating focus, see our blog post: OKRs That Don’t Suck.
Remote or not, ambiguity kills velocity.
I use AORs (Areas of Responsibility) and DRIs (Directly Responsible Individuals) to make ownership unambiguous.
When roles are crisp, calendar load drops because fewer people need to be in the room.
Your wiki is your office.
If it isn’t in the wiki, it doesn’t exist.
We kept a “Front Door” page with links to the weekly doc, scorecard, and priorities.
It cut onboarding time in half because new hires could self-serve the context they needed.
Text isn’t enough for UX or complex flows.
Short videos and annotated images make remote collaboration feel co-located.
I keep a “clips” library for onboarding and recurring tasks.
It’s like pair-programming on demand.
Here’s the split I’ve seen work over and over:
We scheduled our most contentious conversations on anchor days.
Hard problems got solved faster when we could read the room and leave with a decision.
Onboarding is where culture becomes real.
Get it right and new hires hit stride in weeks.
Get it wrong and you lose quarters.
We called it “Day 5 confidence.”
By the first Friday, every new hire had shipped, presented, and received feedback.
Hybrid teams need visible, fair performance systems.
Tie scorecards to OKRs and published metrics.
When expectations are written and measurable, managers manage and teammates trust the process.
For more on hiring and performance for venture-backed teams, see our blog post: Hiring to the Moment.
Distributed teams win when hand-offs are clean.
Think like air traffic control.
One control tower per initiative, with logs that survive shift changes.
The fastest teams decide where information lives and stick to it.
Pin this protocol to your “How We Work” page.
Reinforce it in onboarding and in every retro.
Every meeting needs a purpose, a prep doc, and an owner.
I also run a “parking lot” section at the bottom of each doc for topics we defer.
That keeps the meeting on track and gives us a backlog for future sessions.
Proximity bias is real in hybrid companies and it erodes trust fast.
We also recorded major meetings and wrote executive summaries.
No one missed out because they weren’t physically there.
Hybrid increases the attack surface, so tighten the basics.
Security isn’t just IT’s job in a hybrid setup.
Make it part of onboarding and part of your quarterly review.
Office strategy is also a capital allocation decision.
We cut our footprint by 40% and reinvested in tooling and team travel.
Morale improved and so did throughput.
For more on capital efficiency and runway math, see our blog post: Runway, Burn, and the Operating Plan.
Rituals create belonging whether people are at home or at HQ.
These simple habits keep everyone aligned and connected without micromanagement.
Tools don’t fix process, but the right stack makes good process easy.
Pick one tool per job and stick with it.
Redundancy breeds confusion.
For more on building a pragmatic tool stack, see our blog post: The Startup Stack That Scales.
These lightweight templates will save your team hours every week.
Keep each to a single page wherever possible.
Constraint forces clarity.
I use a simple filter to choose between async and live.
When in doubt, start async with a memo and set a short live follow-up to close.
This hybrid approach keeps the cognitive load low but the decision pace high.
Not every decision deserves the same ceremony.
Label decisions in the doc so everyone knows how to engage.
It reduces anxiety and accelerates ownership.
Surveillance kills trust and doesn’t measure what matters.
Make these visible and argue about improving the system, not policing people.
For more on the right KPIs at each stage, see our blog post: The KPI Ladder by Stage.
Sometimes hybrid fails because the basics are missing.
Most “policy” problems are actually “process” problems in disguise.
One team I advised had great talent but poor velocity.
They were fully remote, drowning in meetings, and burning out.
We made four changes:
In six weeks, cycle time dropped 28%, and the team started shipping weekly again.
No new headcount.
Just better operating design.
Q1: How many anchor days do we need?
Two or three is enough.
Pick them and stick to them.
Q2: What if a team member can’t make anchor days?
Plan exceptions in advance and use demos, recordings, and written summaries to keep them in the loop.
Q3: How do we handle different time zones?
Set a two-hour overlap window on anchor days and use daily hand-off notes to bridge the gap.
Q4: What should be a memo vs a meeting?
If it can be written and reviewed in 24–48 hours, start with a memo.
Use meetings for conflict, creativity, or one-way door decisions.
Q5: How do we prevent meeting sprawl?
Agenda-first policy, memo-first for big topics, time-box meetings, and keep a decision log.
Q6: What metrics matter most for hybrid productivity?
Cycle time, PR review time, experiment velocity, and business outcomes like activation and retention.
Q7: How do we onboard remotely without losing culture?
Use a 30-60-90 plan, buddy system, a wiki front door, and make sure every new hire ships in week one.
Q8: How do we avoid proximity bias?
Publish work in writing, rotate presenters, and tie recognition to outcomes, not presence.
Q9: What’s the minimum viable operating cadence?
Weekly Operating Review, biweekly Product Review, monthly Business Review, and quarterly planning.
Q10: Which tools are non-negotiable?
One docs tool, one project tool, one chat tool, one analytics tool, and Loom for async demos.
Q11: Do we need OKRs at pre-seed?
Keep them ultra-light or skip them.
Use a weekly priorities list and a simple scorecard until the team is 15+.
Q12: How do we keep execs aligned in hybrid?
Weekly exec WOR with a shared scorecard and a running decision log.
The remote vs office argument misses the point.
What matters is designing a hybrid culture, meeting cadence, and async execution system that makes decisions faster and makes work visible.
Anchor days create collaboration time.
Memo-first turns opinions into decisions.
WOR keeps you honest every week.
Do these well and your company will scale with clarity regardless of where people sit.
This is the practical heart of david sacks remote work thinking as I’ve applied it: use the office for creativity, use async for throughput, and run a cadence that compounds.
Subscribe to Capitaly.vc Substack (https://capitaly.substack.com/) to raise capital at the speed of AI.