The Andrew Wilkinson & Tiny Guide to Earnouts vs Cash Upfront (Real-World Founder Math)
The Andrew Wilkinson & Tiny Guide to Earnouts vs Cash Upfront (Real-World Founder Math) exists because founders ask me the same question: should I take the money now or bet on an earnout later.
I’ll show you exactly how I weigh cash at close, earnouts, rollover equity, escrow, and seller notes.
I’ll use simple math, clear rules, and fast templates you can copy.
I’ll also show you how to package your deal so Tiny can move quickly with clean, founder-friendly terms.
I buy durable, profitable businesses and I want founders to leave happy.
Cash upfront reduces your risk.
Earnouts can increase your headline price but add complexity and delay.
This guide helps you choose the mix that maximizes net, certainty, and sanity.
Cash at close.
Money wired on day one.
Lowest risk.
Earnout.
Extra consideration paid later if agreed metrics are hit.
Higher risk.
Rollover equity.
You keep a stake in the company post-close.
Aligned upside.
Seller note.
You finance a slice of the deal.
Paid back with interest.
Escrow / holdback.
Cash set aside to cover reps & warranties.
Released after a period if no claims.
Certainty.
What’s guaranteed vs. what’s contingent.
Control.
Who controls the levers that drive the earnout.
Time.
How long until you actually receive the money.
When in doubt, I overweight certainty.
I’d rather pay a fair price now than argue about adjustments later.
Assume a company with $5M EBITDA and a 6x headline = $30M price.
Assume round numbers for illustration.
Taxes vary by jurisdiction and structure, so talk to your advisor.
A) All Cash at Close
B) 80% Cash + 20% Earnout (12–18 months, EBITDA target)
C) 60% Cash + 40% Earnout (revenue target, 24 months)
D) 70% Cash + 20% Rollover + 10% Seller Note
E) 90% Cash + 10% Escrow (12 months)
Founder takeaway: A smaller headline with more cash often beats a larger headline with heavy earnouts.
Earnouts are useful when there’s a clear, near-term catalyst both sides believe in.
Think migrating a backlog of signed customers, shipping a delayed v2, or turning on distribution you already secured.
My rules of thumb:
Walk if the metric is murky, if the buyer controls all the levers, or if the reporting can be gamed.
Walk if legal definitions run longer than your SPA.
If you wouldn’t lend your own money on those terms, don’t lend your outcome to them either.
Rollover is a bet on the future company with you and the buyer aligned.
Earnout is a bet on hitting a target under terms that may shift.
If you believe in Tiny’s stewardship and the moat, I prefer rollover over a large earnout.
Only roll what you’d happily invest today.
Cash at close is usually treated as capital gains in many jurisdictions.
Earnouts can be taxed when received, sometimes as capital gains, sometimes partly as ordinary income depending on structure.
Rollover can defer tax if structured properly.
This is not advice.
Get a tax plan before you sign the LOI.
Your price adjusts by the net working capital delivered at close.
If you don’t model the peg, you’ll give back dollars you thought you were getting.
Tip: Build a trailing 12-month average, seasonally adjust, and agree on a clear definition.
Small here isn’t small.
It’s real money.
Keep survival periods reasonable and caps tight.
Match escrow size and term to the actual risk.
Use baskets and deductibles to avoid nickel-and-diming.
This shrinks surprises and makes cash-heavy deals easier to approve.
If you must do an earnout, pick one metric.
Revenue is tempting but slippery.
Gross profit is better.
EBITDA is best only if you can lock definitions for add-backs, allocations, and shared services.
Governance must specify:
Strategics change roadmaps, pricing, and teams.
Earnouts die there.
Tiny prefers durable cash machines and light-touch integration.
That’s friendlier to clear metrics and payouts.
Heavy customer concentration, key-person dependencies, or single-platform acquisition will push buyers toward earnouts.
Clean those risks pre-LOI and you’ll convert earnout dollars to cash dollars.
Buyers pay for velocity and certainty.
If your data room is reconciled, your retention and cohorts are clear, and your legal/IP is tidy, I can lean into cash.
Simple beats clever.
Every time.
Align on structure before arguing headline price.
Trade earnout dollars for cash and complexity for certainty.
Use escrow, caps, and a tight peg to protect both sides.
Get tax and estate planning done before you sign.
For crisp comms that speed decisions, see our blog post: I Don’t Respond to Long Emails.
Upload the vital 20% first.
For cutting noise so diligence flies, read: Delete 95% of Your Email.
Vague EBITDA definitions.
Integration “synergies” that reduce your metric.
No say in pricing or hiring.
No audit rights.
Payment nets against unrelated claims.
Shifting seasonality baselines.
If it isn’t explicit, assume it won’t pay.
Be honest about the job you want after close.
If you crave clean separation, prioritize cash and simplicity.
If you love the game and trust the steward, consider rollover.
Design the deal around your life, not Twitter.
For a window into how I think about focus and compounding, read: A $3,600 Keyboard and a $66 Million Dollar Investment.
Days 1–3.
Tight one-pager, 8-slide deck, and pre-built vital data room.
Days 4–10.
First call, align on structure, trade earnout for cash, lock peg and escrow.
Days 11–20.
Diligence sprints with single-thread comms and weekly summaries.
Days 21–30.
Paper the deal, confirm funds flow, finalize transition plan.
For narrative that lands without fluff, see: Never Tell, Always Storytell.
Every $1M shifted from earnout to cash increases certainty by 100% on that dollar.
A 12-month escrow at 10% is usually cheaper than a 24-month earnout at 20%.
One clean metric beats three partial metrics every day of the week.
Complexity compounds against you.
Speed compounds for you.
How big should an earnout be, if I must have one.
Keep it ≤20–25% of the price and ≤18 months.
Which metric is safest for an earnout.
Gross profit with locked definitions, or EBITDA with ironclad add-backs and allocations.
Can I swap a bigger escrow for less earnout.
Yes, and you often should.
Escrow is simpler and ends on a date.
Is rollover equity better than an earnout.
If you trust the operator and the moat, yes.
It aligns incentives without moving goalposts.
What kills earnouts in practice.
Integration changes to pricing, costs, or reporting.
Ambiguous definitions.
No audit rights.
Do I need audited financials to get cash at close.
No, but I need reconciled statements tied to bank and clean supporting schedules.
How do taxes change the best structure.
Materially.
Plan early to optimize capital gains, deferral on rollover, and timing of earnout receipts.
Can I cap the earnout downside.
Yes.
Use floors, collars, and make sure unrelated indemnity claims don’t net against your earnout.
What’s a sensible escrow size and term.
Commonly 5–15% for 12–18 months, calibrated to real risk and reps.
How do I communicate this to my team and customers.
With one clear page emphasizing continuity and benefits, not drama.
Keep it human and brief.
The smartest deals balance cash now with aligned, simple upside later.
If you want high certainty and low drama, trade complexity for cash, keep any earnout short and small, and prefer rollover when you truly believe in the future.
That’s the heart of The Andrew Wilkinson & Tiny Guide to Earnouts vs Cash Upfront (Real-World Founder Math).
Get Your Copy of Never Enough at https://www.neverenough.com/